Posted by: meanmompres on: January 12, 2012
These are disturbing things I’m seeing in the news lately:
• A judge removed a breastfeeding woman from his courtroom
• Facebook deleted thousands of photos of breastfeeding mothers
• Stores have thrown mothers out for breastfeeding
Why? Why is this being allowed? There is no law that prohibits public breastfeeding. None. In one case the police who removed a mother from a store even admitted it was not against the law, as he was removing her; and she went!
T
his is what I don’t understand. Why are moms not refusing to go?
Moms did rebel and make a point to Target by staging a “sit-in” so to speak to publicize the issue. That was positive.
But why did the mom leave in the first place? There was no need for her to interrupt meal time for her infant.
I
f people have a problem with breastfeeding, it’s THEIR problem.
A man named Steve, at The Huffington Post commented, “This does not belong on TV or in public, it is gross.”
Excuse me?? It’s GROSS?? How is the act of feeding your hungry child gross? I say to Steve, “Grow up!”
Sesame Street has been able to handle the “grossness” of breastfeeding in the past as the natural healthy function that it is. But now, Sesame Street is under the gun by the Steves of the world not to teach kids about the most nutritious way to feed their new siblings.
So, what should we tell little Johnny about why the new baby is hiding under a blanket in mommy’s arms, that she’s playing hide n seek? Give me a break!
It’s the Steves of the world, with their neurotic hang-ups, that are dictating policy not to allow public breastfeeding. But it’s also the Steves of the world who are perfectly ok with displaying a naked woman on a magazine cover, with her arms covering only the tiniest of areas, in the front of a 7/11 store rack. Another mom and I went to that store & demanded that the manager put the magazine in the back so our 14 yr old sons didn’t see it when they came in for slurpies. The manager looked at us as if we were nutsy moms & placated us to get us out of his face. That same manager would be “grossed out” I’m sure by a mom coming in with her infant totally covered & breastfeeding. Why are we ok with that??
Come on, moms. Next time someone gives you a dirty look as you’re feeding your baby, smile sweetly & turn away. Next time a store employee asks you to go somewhere else, kindly decline their suggestion & turn away. Support Sesame Street in teaching breastfeeding by telling them you agree.
Do not let the Steves of the world & their immature hang-ups dictate policy because they’re grossed out!
Posted by: meanmompres on: December 31, 2011
A Stockton student was handcuffed with zip ties on his hands and feet, forced to go to the hospital for a psychiatric evaluation and was charged with battery on a police officer.
That student was 5 years old.
http://www.kcra.com/news/29847063/detail.html
This had to be the biggest 5 year old ever, or the smallest policeman ever! How is it possible that a 5 year old requires not only handcuffs (behind his back) but ankle cuffs to be controlled? Let me guess, the policeman left his taser at home that day.
As a “mean mom”, I believe in logical consequences for out of control behavior. But I’m trying hard to understand how the logical consequence of this behavior is to hogtie and throw the kid in the back of a squad car! Was this supposed to teach him something useful? Was this supposed to help him learn to control his behavior?
As a teacher working with challenging kids, my students had a variety of individual issues.
Donny, 6, was emotionally disturbed and occasionally would suddenly throw his books onto the floor & grab at anything within his reach to throw as well. I managed to keep him and his fellow students safe without ever handcuffing him! He required a firm physical restraint in the form of a hug from behind and a quiet voice in his ear until he could calm down. This never took more than a few minutes. Other students did not lose valuable learning time.
Bobby, 9, had occasional outbursts but required a different strategy. This was a student who had been severely abused by his mother. He required a man to soothe him with a calm voice. He could not tolerate being touched at these times and we were able to calm him without cuffs!
In my opinion this school had no understanding of the needs of their student and no plan in place to address a possible outburst. And clearly, this policeman has no clue how to deal with a child and should never be allowed near one! Please tell me he doesn’t have any kids!
So my questions are;
what is being done to punish the officer who man-handled a 5 year old child and what is being done by the school to finally address this student’s educational needs? Note, in the link to the original article, his mother has repeatedly asked for interventional strategies. This is what they came up with? So, is this officer on call to come charging into the classroom wielding his cuffs? Oh yes, the judge did drop the charges. Good move!
Posted by: meanmompres on: December 13, 2011
You find your child sobbing by the fireplace hung with Christmas stockings & you run to comfort him, thinking he’s afraid he wasn’t a good boy this year so Santa is going to put coal in his stocking (or bring him only socks and underwear, my favorite threat).
Gently, you tell him you’re sure Santa will bring him something he hopes for, anticipating his angelic smile.
Instead he looks up at you with sadness & accusation in his little face and says,
Joey told me there’s NO Santa Claus! Is it true?
There it is, the dreaded question you’ve been hoping to put off for years yet. So, now what? Do you tell him Joey is right? Do you tell him Joey is a little bully who made it up to hurt him? If you tell him Joey is wrong, are you lying to your child?
Families who believe in Santa go to great lengths
to protect that belief. As our children approach the questioning age, we resort to all kinds of strategies to prolong the fantasy; separate wrapping paper and tags for Santa presents, eating the cookies to prove Santa was there, planting foot prints in the snow, making noises to mimic hooves on the rooftop, or running outside to investigate strange noises.
Some parents take it so seriously, that they protect their children from other children who try to spoil it. CNN reported an irate mother who confronted the mother of the offending child, claiming that child would not be allowed to play with her child anymore and that this family had destroyed something special for them. Was this an overreaction?
Fran Walfish, child and family psychotherapist and author of “The Self-Aware Parent, says children under the age of 7 are likely to believe what their parents tell them. Between second and fourth grade is the peak of what Walfish refers to as the latency phase of child development, and is the period during which parents can expect the question.
Are you prepared for it? How will you respond?
Paul Hokemeyer, a marriage and family therapist suggests looking at the dilemma from this point of view. It’s an opportunity to teach children about the importance of finding their own voice and truths in the world. “Explain to them that the world is a diverse and large place where people hold different views on the same topic,” he says. “And further explain that what’s important is to believe in what feels true at a particular moment in time and to hold on to it for however long as it feels honest and true.”
Walfish stresses that most importantly for parents, ’tis not the season to feel guilty about the Santa tradition. “Moms and dads need to relax and cut themselves some slack,” she says. “You are not changing the truth for personal gain or deceit. Santa is part of our folklore. The celebration of Christmas has included Santa Claus for almost all young children. You are passing down the folklore, keeping up the tradition and allowing your child to fully enjoy the magic.”
In our family, we chose to focus on the magic of the holiday.
When my sons questioned the existence of a man named Santa who lived in the North Pole with flying reindeer and elves, we talked about the magic of the season of giving & that Santa represented that. He may not actually be a living man as we think of it, but he lives in our hearts as the magic of the season. Children believe in magic and so do we, if we let ourselves. All things are possible when you allow yourself to see beyond concrete reality. Tying the magic into the act of giving worked for us. We kept Santa alive for many years.
And, incidentally, Santa now brings socks and underwear every year to my struggling college sons & they wait anxiously for them!
So, how will you answer this question, or how have you answered it that might help other parents when they’re faced with it?
Posted by: meanmompres on: November 1, 2011
You’re in the grocery store with your young child & open a food item to eat as you shop. I believe every parent has done this at some point. The intention is to pay for the food at checkout of course. But when you’re in a hurry, you’re tired, your child is fussy, you have a million things on your mind, it is possible to forget to show the cashier that wrapper.
Is that shoplifting? Should you be arrested, hauled to jail, and processed as a prisoner with mug shot and fingerprints? For a food wrapper??
Nicole Leszczynski not only experienced this, but one of the most
horrifying experiences a parent can endure: watching her child taken away from her into protective custody.
The story is detailed here http://news.yahoo.com/pregnant-mom-says-sandwich-arrest-horrifying-214407004.html.
As a parent I would be mortified to be caught forgetting to pay for the sandwich. But to be booked as a criminal AND to lose your child to strangers for an unknown amount of time would make me completely hysterical.
Store officials claim they were only following policy. Policy is important, I understand. But I’m struggling to understand how policy could dictate the events that took place in this situation.
What is your reaction? Was the store justified in arresting the couple and taking their child away?
Posted by: meanmompres on: October 27, 2011
An Ohio State University group called Students Teaching Against Racism in Society, or STARS, has launched a campaign against costumes that it believes are racially insensitive. STARS created posters of people dressed as racial stereotypes like Japanese geishas, a Latino wearing a poncho and sombrero, and an Arab terrorist wearing a fake bomb. The posters say, “We’re a culture, not a costume.” Sarah Williams, the president of STARS, told ABC News, “We want to highlight these offensive costumes because we’ve all seen them.”
Halloween has always been a favorite holiday for my family. It’s a day when you can be anyone you want to be, emulate your role model, make a statement, or be scary and goulish and gross (I raised boys). It was a light-hearted holiday, just for fun. The group STARS message made me think back to some of the costumes my kids wore and whether they should have been considered offensive.
As a parent, I felt it was extremly important to teach my kids sensitivity, tolerance, and acceptance. So, when my son wanted to be an Indian, was I teaching him insensitivity? Should I have used this as a teaching moment? Certainly some costumes cross the line of negative stereotyping.
I’d like to hear from other parents about what is acceptable for their children’s costumes and how much thought they give to the message costumes send.
Add your comment, including the ages of your kids. What costumes, if any, would you forbid your kids to wear?
Posted by: meanmompres on: May 31, 2011
School is out for the summer and the kids are free. Oh boy. Oh no! A kid’s dream, a mom’s nightmare! How are you going to survive?
The answer is to become a mean mom. No, that doesn’t mean to be nasty and negative and lock them in their rooms for the summer. It means to take charge and have a plan that you can stick to.
Watch this TV interview and learn the 3 steps to not just surviving, but making it a great summer with a balance between freedom and structure.
You don’t want to ruin their summer, or yours. So you need to give them some freedom and loosen up some of the structure. But if you want to survive with your sanity this summer, there has to be balance and a plan.
Posted by: meanmompres on: April 18, 2011
Absolutely nothing! Promoting transgender lifestyle… seriously??!! Wow. And I thought the homophobics had been hidden away in the closet. Can we throw them in there now & lock the door? There should be room now that the gays and transgenders have been let out.
Please tell me no one paid any serious attention to this silly ranting about turning a little boy gay because he has pink toe nails. We haven’t really slid back into the dark ages, have we?
I’d like to check in with my 2 grown sons on this who are, by the way, quite manly and no longer wear pink nail polish or bake in their Susie Homemaker miniature oven. Yes, my sons both had their nails polished as little boys. They wore dress up costumes that might have included their mom’s shoes and jewelry. OK, now don’t storm my home with Monster Mother signs, but yes, they even wore a bit of makeup when they were little to see what it felt and looked like. One of them had a Barbie doll. Horrors!
When working professionally with kids, a mom once grabbed a toy vacuum cleaner out of the hands of her 3 year old son, saying, “Don’t play with that. It’ll make you gay.” I looked at her and said, “Please tell me you don’t truly believe that!” I promoted anything my boys would do in the way of cleaning & cooking. They need to be able to take care of themselves someday! By the time they were 12 they did their own laundry and took turns making family meals. If this is gay, I’m all for it. I would even be all for it if they cooked and cleaned in pink toe nail polish!
No, they didn’t paint their toe nails anymore by that age. Why? Because it’s not acceptable in school. However, it is acceptable for boys to wear earrings, eyebrow & nose rings, tongue studs, and flower tattoos. Go figure.
Posted by: meanmompres on: February 21, 2011
Waiting to pounce.She instills fear in me, and I’m an adult. I can’t imagine what it must have been like for the kids growing up in this jungle of danger. They must have been constantly on the alert for the crouching tiger to attack. They must have been putting all their energy into trying to live up to ever rising expectations, trying to earn the conditional love of the one person who should be giving them unconditional love.
This crouching tiger believes that the way to help her kids reach their potential, which is every mom’s goal, is to push them unmercifully, belittle them for less than their best, and withhold love as punishment. How sad that this will accomplish her goal but at the same time raise kids who will never feel secure, never be able to love unconditionally, and in fact not reach their potential no matter how many A’s they earn or how many hours they practice to perfect techniques.
This is why. The researcher, Abraham Maslow, in a paper called A Theory of Human Motivation, identified a hierarchy of human needs that must be met, in sequential order, to reach full maturity.
The hierarchy consists of five levels. If we are not provided the critical needs of each level, we cannot progress effectively to the next one, thus interrupting the process of becoming a fully mature adult. The levels are:
This mean mom’s philosophy is that it is our job as parents to provide the first three levels in order to enable our kids to progress to the last two. The first is physical, the most basic needs for survival.
The second is provided by setting realistic, consistent boundaries that help kids feel safe and secure. This is the foundation of the mean mom philosophy, feeling safe and knowing they can count on their parents no matter what.
The third level needs to be woven into the first two continually. Love and affection are so important to our survival that we will not mature as healthy adults without them. The mean mom philosophy includes love and acceptance of each person even when their behavior is not acceptable. The behavior may be bad, the kid is not. No behavior will ever be so unacceptable that it warrants withdrawal of love and affection. The toughest thing I’ve dealt with in working with families is seeing the terrible impact this has on a child. This is the Tiger mom’s weapon in trying to push her children into reaching their potential. It is the equivalent of the predator lying in wait to pounce on the prey and destroy it because it’s weak.
Kids who grow up with this kind of conditional love and rejection of affection will learn to get better grades and will work hard to reach the goal that someone else sets for them. That may sound like enough. But look again at Maslow’s five steps. By crouching like a predator and attacking, the parent destroys the ability to become confident in themselves, feel value for who they are, and find their own passion in life. They will always look for external direction and reward, relying on that to determine their worth and who they are as human beings.
So while the tiger mom proudly holds up the perfect grades and rejects the creativity that may not meet her sense of potential, her kids are learning to work for conditional acceptance and external reward, thinking that’s all there is. What a shame.
As a mean mom, I’m very proud of my grown kids who may not ever have made straight A report cards, but who are creative thinkers and self-motivators working toward their own passions.
Posted by: meanmompres on: December 21, 2010
No, not a corporate boardroom or military strategy bunker. This scene is much more intense with much more at stake. You might even have been a part of one like it.
No, not powerful board members who hold the future of a conglomerate in their hands. Not generals deciding the fate of the free world. You have probably been a stakeholder in this negotiation.
WalMart, K-Mart, the grocery store. A frazzled mom and a fussy kid in a shopping cart. Feel the tension build as the demands start and the players hit walls of resistance and look for strategies to win. The whining revs up and the voice begins to gain a sharp edge. Observers look wary and some move away so as not to be caught in the fallout. The situation could deteriorate to disaster with one wrong move.
What will the strategy be that averts this crisis? M&M’s! M&Ms doled out one at a time to keep control. “I want to buy that toy.” “No, you can’t have that toy and if you stop whining you can have 3 M&Ms. Three, count ‘em three: doled out carefully into his little hand. “I want more.” “You can have 2 more when you go potty.” Wow, now that’s negotiation!
I witnessed this scene just recently and it made me think about what was really being taught.
In my opinion this negotiation will result in one of two things. One, that child is going to develop an unreasonable aversion to M&Ms that even his shrink will have trouble curing someday. OR by the age of 6 he will become a master negotiator and will do absolutely nothing without getting something in return. I’m not sure which is worse, though as a mom, I believe creating a great negotiator is far more dangerous.
It’s one thing to reward good behavior. It’s another to teach your kid that every good deed will be paid for. Some good deeds are expected. It’s expected that when you give an instruction it will be followed. It’s expected that, as part of a family, you help with chores and show consideration for others. It’s expected that, as a student, you do your homework and put out your best effort. What is this negotiation trend? Is this what we want to teach as a strategy for getting through life?
If we grow up believing that everything we’re asked to do is negotiable, we’re in big trouble when we get into the work world and the boss says, “Here’s the assignment. Get it done by end of the week.” How many bosses have you seen offering 3 M&Ms for meeting that deadline? And how many employees have you seen successfully hold out for 5?!
Posted by: meanmompres on: November 28, 2010
First of all I’m annoyed in general by any commercial that sells adult items through kids. I hate it when kids tell adults what they should be eating or what they should buy, especially when the product is something a kid could know nothing about.
But this commercial goes beyond annoying. This commercial uses kids’ peer pressure to tell parents to keep up with the Jones’s so they don’t embarrass them. Are you kidding me?!
In this commercial, one kid’s father is picking him up from school in an old car. When the kid sees the father he hides for fear other kids will see it. Then the star kid proudly saunters up to the Toyota Highlander. As he struts up to the vehicle, he tells us that just because they’re parents, they don’t have to be lame. The clear message is that parents embarrass their kids if they don’t drive a Highlander. What?!
The first time I saw this commercial, I thought it was a joke. When I realized it was intended to be serious marketing for Toyota I was angry.
Does no one else think this is sending a terrible message? As parents, we have an obligation to keep up with the Jones’s so as not to embarrass our kids? Is this the value we want to teach?
A friend once told me she worried that her kids were deprived because she didn’t drive a new car and didn’t have the most recent electronics in their home. And people wonder where this “gimme” entitlement generation has come from.
If parents are buying into this, then we’re really in trouble.